thewealthnet     About Us    |    FAQs    |    Contact Us
 
  Search
 
     
  Advanced Search       RSS Feed  twitter  linkedin 
Welcome to thewealthnet    |   Europe, Middle East & Africa Get The App   |   Login
  Sun 21st Oct 2018  |    Make this my homepage  
Subscribe now!
Credit Cards Accepted
World Map
    
Nathalie Dauriac claims victory after being awarded £1 million from John Caudwell
12/07/2018 , News Team

French private banking executive Nathalie Dauriac is claiming victory over her onetime backer John Caudwell, after a new court ruling that the mobile phones entrepreneur must pay 55 percent of her legal costs.

She said, in a statement, that with the £500,000 already awarded in damages, she will get “well over £1 million.”

But Ms Dauriac said she was still considering an appeal over what she called the undervaluation of her shares in Signia Wealth Management, which Mr Caudwell controlled. 

The banker became mired in a dispute with Mr Caudwell, founder of Phones 4U, after setting up Signia together. In a May court case, it was alleged Ms Dauriac had wrongly claimed about £30,000 in expenses. 

In that case, it was ruled that she had been constructively dismissed. In addition, there had been no proper determination of the value of her shares and she was entitled to about £500,000.

Mr Justice Marcus Smith has now published a follow-up ruling in which he made decisions about who should pay lawyers' bills. The judge said the general rule was that the loser picked up the winner's bills.

He said the conclusions he had reached represented something of “a mixed outcome for both parties”. But it seemed clear Ms Dauriac was “the winner” although her victory had its pyrrhic elements.

He had concluded that Mr Caudwell should pick up 55 percent of Ms Dauriac's legal costs.

Ms Dauriac said: “I am delighted that (this) judgement vindicates the case I brought on constructive dismissal and the wrongful valuation of my shares, confirming that I am the winner, and that the judge has seen fit to award me 55 percent of my costs, over and above the half a million pounds I was awarded in damages, totalling well over £1 million.”

She added, “This has been a protracted battle, going on for three years, with significant financial and emotional costs for me. The judgment finally gives me financial certainty and underlines the fact that I won on the key fundamentals.”

 

Share with Linkedin Share with Twitter
 RATE THIS ARTICLE
Poor   Average   Good   Excellent
thewealthnet archives contain 50,324 articles dating back to 1997,making it the largest single source of information on the wealth management industry world-wide. To search for more articles, please click here.

 

© This article originally featured on thewealthnet. It is protected by international copyright law. If you copy this article illegally, you will be liable to prosecution. All rights in and relating to this article are expressly reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission from the publishers.

 
    Latest Headlines:    by Topic | All News
 
  Advertise   |   Contribute   |   Press Release   |   Terms of Use   |   Privacy   |   Contact Us Copyright Pam Insight Ltd., All Rights Reserved